<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grammar Tip #6: Plurals and Apostrophes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sarahleavitt.com/writing/grammar-tip-6-plurals-and-apostrophes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sarahleavitt.com/comics-and-writing/writing/grammar-tip-6-plurals-and-apostrophes/</link>
	<description>The website for Sarah Leavitt, Vancouver writer, editor and cartoonist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiley</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahleavitt.com/comics-and-writing/writing/grammar-tip-6-plurals-and-apostrophes/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>kiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahleavitt.com/word/?p=170#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Good points, but what about the dilemma of the singular possessive of a word ending in &quot;s&quot;? For example, my company is called Turner-Riggs. That &quot;s&quot; gives me no end of trouble. According to my general preferences (which include avoidance of the truncated possessive as in &quot;that business&#039; main concern&quot;), it should be &quot;Turner-Riggs&#039;s clients include ...&quot; But this is ugly. So I&#039;m resorting to a lot of sentence structure finagling to get out of having to make Turner-Riggs possessive at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, but what about the dilemma of the singular possessive of a word ending in &#8220;s&#8221;? For example, my company is called Turner-Riggs. That &#8220;s&#8221; gives me no end of trouble. According to my general preferences (which include avoidance of the truncated possessive as in &#8220;that business&#8217; main concern&#8221;), it should be &#8220;Turner-Riggs&#8217;s clients include &#8230;&#8221; But this is ugly. So I&#8217;m resorting to a lot of sentence structure finagling to get out of having to make Turner-Riggs possessive at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

